Critical Appraisal of the Spine Literature: The Fundamentals
Course DetailsDate: 11 January 2018
Venue: Toulouse, France (Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropraxie)
Fee: EUROSPINE/IFEC members: €100; non-members: €120
This is a collaborative arrangement between IFEC and EUROSPINE.
Register Now!Follow the below link and start your course registration! esociety.netkey.at/eurospine/myeducation/
>> access to MyEducation
Please note that, if you already are an EUROSPINE member and wish to take advantage of the EUROSPINE member discount when registering for the module, you must ensure you have settled your 2018 membership fee before starting your course registration. This can be done through your MyUserArea >> membership.
Education Week 2018
Course Director and FacultyCourse Director: Rachid Salmi, MD PhD
Pierre Côté, DC PhD
Margareta Nordin, Dr. Med. Sci.
Local host: Olivier Lanlo
Course DescriptionThis course will provide participants with the necessary skills to critically appraise the quality of the spine literature. Specifically, the course will introduce basic study designs and discuss the main threats to the validity of clinical studies. Learning methods include didactic lectures and a workshop. Recently published papers will be used in the workshop. The topics covered in the course include: randomised clinical trails, cohorts studies, case-series, case study, selection bias, measurement bias and confounding. Participants will learn to use a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of randomised control trials and cohort studies.
Learning OutcomesUpon successful completion of this course the participant will be able to:
Course DesignThis course will include three one-hour lectures and one three-hour workshop. The lectures will include presentations where study designs, biases and critical appraisal methods will be discussed. The workshop will include a 1.5 hour group session where a published study will be critically appraised under the guidance of a faculty member. The course will conclude with a structured group discussion about the validity of the reviewed paper.